CII protests RBI rules on auditors, says will cause enormous difficulties – Business Standard

The Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) rules changing throw up “enormous operational difficulties” and are disruptive for and non-banks, said the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) in a statement.

The central bank, on April 27, asked and non-banking financial companies (NBFC), excluding those who don’t take deposits and have below Rs 1,000-crore asset base, to immediately bring in new in case the firm has completed three years of audit of a bank or NBFC. may do the change from the second half of the year.

and having asset size of Rs 15,000 crore or more were asked to appoint joint Crucially, a retrospective applicability of the extended eligibility criteria for the auditors, including those relating to provision of audit and non-audit services.

CII is the latest to object to these rules, after NBFC association Industry Development Council (FIDC) wrote to the

“It is a widely accepted principle that, to reduce uncertainty and implementation challenges, such significant policy measures are not applied retrospectively and allow a reasonable transition period for a better understanding, planning and compliance,” said CII in a statement.

ALSO READ: Explained: How RBI’s tough new rules impact the audit companies

Identifying the right audit firm requires time and efforts, and applying the circular for 2021-22 will cause “enormous operational difficulties in implementation,” it said, adding without any transitional planning, the requirement of appointing new auditors for the year 2021- 22 would be extremely challenging and create avoidable hardships for various stakeholders.

There is “practically no time to carry out and complete this process,” for banks that will have to now appoint new auditors for the year 2021-22. The have been allowed to complete this process in the second half of the financial year 2021-22, which also is inadequate, the statement said.

The problem is accentuated for entities that are required to select and appoint two or more audit firms to replace the existing auditors, it said. A large number of audit firms would also be ineligible under the rules because of their prior engagements with the firms.

Besides, the circular would require mid-term resignation of auditors, which would break contracts in large number of cases and create disruptions in banking and NBFC space. This would be even more difficult during the Covid period.

CII argued that the Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements (LODR) norms of the Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI) requires statutory auditor of a listed company to undertake a limited review of the audit of all the companies whose accounts are to be consolidated with the listed entity as per Accounting Standard 21.

The circular “will force the group to appoint different auditors within the group. Having multiple auditors in a group where Bank/ NBFCs is a parent or is an entity in the group, will pose challenges of coordination between different auditors and perform an effective review,” CII said.

The change of auditors may not also resonate with international investors, it argued.

ALSO READ: NBFCs had objected to RBI rules on auditor change, called for expert panel

“A period of three years is too short for a large bank/ NBFC having large number of branches across India. The complexity and span of operations makes a tenure of three years inadequate to leverage any benefit of skills and experience.

“Accordingly, there are capacity constraints as far as large firms with appropriate skills and size and, therefore, the choice is limited. Given the fragmentation, there is unarguably a need for greater number of large firms with multi-disciplinary capabilities to deal with complex audits of large banks and NBFCs,” CII said.

Dear Reader,

Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

scroll to top